KPI Metric Cards
Single-value indicators for immediate report reading.
- A · Compact KPI Card: small metric for mobile sections.
- B · Large Hero KPI: highlighted match-level value.
- C · Comparative KPI: Team A vs Team B side-by-side.
PadelCount A Professional Service for Padel match analysis
This page is a static reference catalog for the statistical charts that can be integrated into PadelCount reports, player pages, team comparisons, AI-derived sections and future dashboards. Each visualization has a unique ID and multiple variants, so future report upgrades can refer to a precise chart model.
Readable and usable on smartphones without horizontal overflow.
Printable in static PDF reports without requiring animations.
Designed to receive values from match JSON, AI JSON or future databases.
Compatible with report branding, custom CSS and grey AI-derived sections.
Use the chart ID and variant name as a stable reference for future report requests.
Single-value indicators for immediate report reading.
Direct comparison between teams, players or tactical categories.
Grouped columns for set-by-set or player-by-player values.
Multidimensional profiles for players or teams.
Momentum, streaks and tactical turning points across the match.
Distribution and intensity of rally duration.
Proportional breakdowns for point types or tactical categories.
AI-derived estimated tactical density, not real tracking coordinates.
Estimated territorial control and inferred positional pressure.
Shot selection, frequency and efficiency.
Global rhythm, control and stability across sets.
Professional static tables for long-form reports and PDF export.
Reliability and confidence visualization for AI-derived values.
Comparison across multiple matches, teams or time periods.
Visual evolution through rounds or competition phases.
AI-derived recurring tactical behaviors and sequences.
Performance in decisive points and high-stress moments.
Estimated intensity from rally density and long-rally load.
Future charts can be requested and generated using a stable chart ID and variant code.
{
"chart_type": "PC-RADAR-004",
"variant": "B",
"title": "Team Tactical Comparison",
"data_source": "team_metrics"
}
Every chart model listed above is shown here with invented sample data. These examples are intended as a practical visual reference for future report design.
Two ways to display single-value performance indicators.
Team and player comparisons with direct visual ranking.
Grouped columns for set, player and match comparisons.
Multidimensional tactical profiles.
Momentum and pressure evolution through the match.
Rally duration and physical match rhythm.
Proportional tactical and statistical breakdowns.
AI-derived estimated tactical density, not real tracking.
Estimated territorial control and pressure zones.
Shot selection, frequency and efficiency.
| Shot | Used | Effective | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lob | 34% | 78% | Low |
| Volley | 28% | 64% | Med |
| Smash | 11% | 52% | High |
Global rhythm, control and tactical stability.
Professional report tables for mobile and PDF.
| Metric | A | B |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 112 | 100 |
| Games | 18 | 13 |
| Breaks | 8 | 6 |
| Metric | Team A | Team B | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hold Rate | 62% | 47% | A +15 |
| Pressure | 71 | 58 | A +13 |
| Errors | 21 | 29 | A better |
Reliability and confidence display for AI-derived values.
Compare reports, players, teams or historical trends.
Control 64
Control 72
| Match | Win% | Rally Avg | Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | 52 | 8.4 | 61 |
| M2 | 57 | 10.1 | 68 |
| M3 | 61 | 9.7 | 74 |
Progression through tournament rounds.
AI-derived tactical behaviors and repeated sequences.
Performance in high-stress points.
Estimated intensity from rally density and load.
High load from long rallies